The FARs
require entries in a pilot’s logbook for several limited purposes, such as
establishing a record of flight time for qualification for a higher rating,
maintaining a record of pilot proficiency under IFR and substantiating recent
flight experience. However, an up-to-date logbook may be the second most
important document next to the pilot’s aviation insurance policy in case of an
accident. Here’s why –
Typically
insurance brokers or agents will, prior to the inception date,
or
the renewal of that policy, send an aviator a pilot-history form that
he
or she must complete before the broker or agent will seek quotes
from
the insurance market. Most pilots will estimate their flight
experience
in the various categories specified in the history form
without
going to their logbook for verification. The reason for this
is
that many pilots, especially those with higher certificates and ratings,
do
not log all of their time; they only record the number of hours
required
by FARs to be legal. In addition, many who do not seek higher
ratings
look at the task of logging time as one more unnecessary detail.
The unfortunate truth is that should
an accident occur, the NTSB will undoubtedly look to the pilot’s logbook to see
if he or she was qualified for the flight, and then his or her insurance
company will look at the logbook to see if the pilot-history form, which was submitted
to the broker or agent and is part of the application for insurance, is
corroborated by actual entries in that same logbook.
The scenario in cases where the
pilot has estimated flight hours on his or her insurance form goes something
like this: The insurance company issues a
policy based on a mis-representation that a pilot has 2,500 hours total time –
1,500 hours were multiengine and 1,800 hours were retractable. However, the
pilot’s logbook shows 1,500 hours total time – 750 hours multiengine and 800
hours retractable. Since the pilot is often deceased or unavailable because of
injuries when a post-crash inquiry is being made, the insurance carrier decides
to decline coverage based on this material representation or breach of the
insured’s warranties of the pilot’s experience.
Unfortunately, the lack of insurance
coverage becomes another unnecessary complication to the already complicated
aftermath of an accident.
Some pilot-history or qualification
forms ask for the flight time logged, others just ask for the flight time or
pilot-in-command time under various subcategories. The need to be precise is
not often made clear by brokers or agents, many of whom just do not understand
the significance of these different terms, especially when that language is
used in the investigation of an accident. Often times if a claim is made after
an accident against a manufacturer for deaths of occupants of an aircraft based
on defective design or manufacture of the aircraft, the best available defense
will be the lack of recent flight experience of the pilot or the lack of his or
her total experience in the aircraft. This argument is often made when a
manufacturer wants to show either misuse or abuse of the aircraft as the cause
of the accident or just plain pilot error due to inexperience.
The careful logging of time,
however, seemingly insignificant, can leave an important legacy to a large
estate. If flight time is not documented, an uninsured loss might make a small
estate out of a very large one.
Just as important, a legitimate
claim that the death of a pilot or other occupants was caused by an aircraft
defect can be made far less valuable or even worthless if a pilot does not
carefully record flights in his or her logbook. Failure to substantiate flight
experience may give the impression that the pilot was unqualified for the
flight, not by FAR standards, but in the eyes of the jury.
It can even be more troublesome in
the case of placing insurance through a direct writer of aviation insurance
because there is no recourse against an independent insurance agent or broker
who may have inadvertently estimated flight time instead of logged pilot time
required by some insurance carriers.
Here are a few suggestions that
might be helpful to pilots in dealing with this little known, potentially
serious, insurance problem:
1.
Getting
into the habit of noting flights in their logbook, even those local flights
that seem to be of little importance to record.
2.
Inserting
a note in their logbook that all flight time has not been recorded, and attach
some separate realistic estimates of past unrecorded time.
3.
Read
the pilot-history form carefully and verify all flight times that are reported.
If the flight experience is an estimate it should be stated as such. If the
flight experience is not logged, it should be mentioned. In fact, a broker or
agent might even require the underwriter to acknowledge that the pilot-history
form times are estimates or are only approximate. This holds true with respect
to other questions on the pilot-history form regarding training and recurrent
training; hours during the last 12 months and last 90 days; total instrument
and night flying.
4.
The
insurance policy must be read carefully to make certain that the declarations
page and any endorsements specify the pilots experience and he or she has
logbook entries to back it up.
5.
Make
certain that in reporting flight experience on the application for a medical
certificate, the times reported are consistent with the insurance application
and pilot-history form as well as the logbook. If the pilot carefully documents
the flight time for the insurance company and then only makes an estimate of
that time when applying for a medical certificate, that disparity will come
back to haunt him or her.
6.
It
is important to be honest about estimating and recording flight experience. It
is hard to be untruthful and consistent at that same time. Inconsistency can
make a completely honest claim worthless and more importantly, could lead the
pilot into not realizing his or her own experience limitations.
The pilot’s logbook is like a diary.
Not only for the pilot, but also others reading it. It is like going back in
time and realizing the experiences, great and small, make flying so exciting
and economically rewarding. It is part of the pilot that lives on, and in the
event of an accident, be the best insurance he or she ever had.
Article
Submitted by: Alexander T. Wells, Ed.D.
I think most people would do the same when they are headed with the situation.
ReplyDeletepilot logbook data entry